In a two-sentence order on Monday, the justices denied a stay of execution for Carman Deck, a man on Missouri’s death row who is scheduled to be executed on Tuesday. There were no public dissents from the order.
Deck’s application called on the court to determine whether his constitutional rights were violated by a long delay between his conviction and his final sentencing. He argued that confusion in the lower courts over the constitutionality of inordinate delays in sentencing, particularly in capital sentencing, must be remedied.
In 1998, Deck was convicted of murdering James and Zelma Long while robbing their home two years earlier. Over the next decade, he was sentenced three times. His first two death sentences were overturned, including in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2005. In that case, Deck v. Missouri, the court held in an opinion by Justice Stephen Breyer that the use of visible restraints is forbidden in a capital trial’s penalty phase, just as it is during the guilt phase.
Deck’s third, and final, sentencing was delayed three years for various procedural reasons, including the discovery that a niece of the victims was working on the case in the prosecutor’s office. In 2008, a jury again sentenced him to death.
Due to the delay, his application argued, Deck’s counsel was no longer able to find or contact family members for live testimony who had previously provided mitigating evidence of substantial childhood physical and emotional abuse and frequent foster home placements. No live lay witness testimony was presented at the third sentencing trial.
Missouri disputed the relevance of this claim, stating that Deck did have lay testimony from family members in two video depositions and two written depositions read aloud into the record and that there is no evidence that live testimony would have strengthened his case. The state also argued that Deck had plenty of time to raise his claims in an earlier state habeas petition, and therefore, the Supreme Court should not intervene now.
The justices turned down Deck’s application without comment on Monday afternoon.
Also on Monday, Missouri Gov. Mike Parson rejected Deck’s application for clemency. His execution is scheduled to take place by lethal injection in Bonne Terre, Missouri, on Tuesday evening.
Recommended Citation: Ellena Erskine, Court green-lights execution of Missouri man who complained of long delay between conviction and sentencing, SCOTUSblog (May. 2, 2022, 5:34 PM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/court-green-lights-execution-of-missouri-man-who-complained-of-long-delay-between-conviction-and-sentencing/
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.
NEW: Next Monday will be a Supreme Court opinion day. Starting at 10 a.m. EDT, the court expects to issue one or more decisions in argued cases from the current term.
Just in: The Supreme Court denies a request to block the execution of Clarence Dixon, an Arizona man who is scheduled to be put to death today. Dixon's attorneys argued that, because of a mental illness, Dixon is not mentally fit to be executed under the Eighth Amendment.
On this date in “How Appealing” history: At this very moment twenty years ago, this blog came into existence, boosting your humble author from nearly total obscurity to perhaps a modicum less than nearly total obscurity. On this happy occasion, I once https://howappealing.abovethelaw.com/2022/05/06/#179553
How the unprecedented Supreme Court leak may have been a response to an earlier disclosure about the justices' private deliberations. @TomGoldsteinSB on what it all means for the court and its secrets.
How the leak might have happened - SCOTUSblog
Among the debates generated by the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Dobbs is whether the leaker was...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court confirms the authenticity of the draft opinion revealed last night by Politico. The chief justice has ordered an investigation into the leak.
ABOUT RESOURCES JOB POSTINGS PRIVACY POLICY CONTACT US
Sign up to receive a daily email digest from follow.it by entering your email.